Legal Opinion
Carolina, Clinchfield And Ohio Railway v. Interstate Commerce Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 23, 1979No. 77-1665PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
593 F.2d 1305
193 U.S.App.D.C. 151
CAROLINA, CLINCHFIELD AND OHIO RAILWAY, et al., Petitioners,
v.
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION and United States of America,
Respondents,
National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, Intervenor.
No. 77-1665.
United States Court of Appeals,
District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued Oct. 26, 1978.
Decided Jan. 23, 1979.
Stuart C. Stock, Washington, D. C., with whom Michael Boudin, Washington, D. C., and Peter J. Hunter, Jr., Roanoke, Va., were on the brief, for petitioners.
Kenneth G. Caplan, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, I. C. C., Washington, D. C., with whom…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- City of Greenwood v. PeacockSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Houston, East & West Texas Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Municipal Light Boards of Reading and Wakefield Massachusetts v. Federal Power Commission, Boston Edison Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Colorado Springs v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1980