Legal Opinion
Kingsley v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided February 14, 1990No. 019-88PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
2Per curiam
Appellant was convicted by a jury of “purchase of a child.” V.T.C.A., Penal Code, § 25.06. Punishment was assessed at seven (7) years imprisonment in the Texas Department of Corrections and a $5,000 fine.
The Fifth Court of Appeals reversed and remanded on the ground that the trial court had erred by admitting evidence of unadjudicated extraneous offenses during the punishment phase of the trial. Kingsley v. State, 744 S.W.2d 191 (Tex.App.— Dallas [5th] 1987). We granted the State’s petition for discretionary review tf> determine whether the…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Sheffield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Drew v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Kingsley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
4Cited by8 opinions
- Grunsfeld v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
- Beasley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
- McMillian v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Slott v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1992
- Gene Delacruz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.