Legal Opinion

Drew v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 21, 1989No. 1168-86PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

CLINTON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted for the offense of indecency with a child, and his punishment assessed by the jury at ten years confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections, probated, and a fine of $10,-000.

In reversing appellant’s conviction, the First Court of Appeals relied upon the decision of the Fifth Court of Appeals in Murphy v. State, 700 S.W.2d 747 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1985), to hold the trial court erred in admitting evidence of an extraneous act of indecency with a child at the punishment phase of trial simply because…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Murphy v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
  2. Drew v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Grunsfeld v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. Grunsfeld v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
  3. Lopez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
  4. Peters v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2000
  5. Griffin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API