Attorney General ex rel. Lawrence v. Trombly
Michigan Supreme Court
Quo warranto. Information in the nature of a quo warranto to test the right of respondent to hold the office of auditor of Wayne county. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.
The relator files an information in the nature of a quo toarranto to compel David Trombly, the respondent, to show by what warrant he holds the office of county auditor of Wayne county.
The information sets forth that respondent has usurped, intruded into, and unlawfully held and exercised, and still does usurp, etc., the said office; that—
“1. On July 27, 1889, and for some time prior thereto, the board of auditors of Wayne county, Mich., consisted of Albert Stoll, Charles P. Collins, and William C. Mahoney.
“2. On July 28, 1889, the said William 0. Mahoney, while auditor as aforesaid, died,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People ex rel. Le Roy v. HurlbutMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- People ex rel. Attorney-General v. LothropMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by11 opinions
- State ex rel. Attorney General v. MooresNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- State ex rel. Martin v. EkernWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- People ex rel. Fuller v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- State ex rel. Heim v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
- Board of Election Commissioners v. Wayne Circuit JudgesMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.