Legal Opinion
Imen v. Glassford
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 31, 1988No. D004896PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WIENER, Acting P. J.
In this atypical real estate transaction, defendant Harry Warner Glassford, a licensed real estate salesman, named himself as copurchaser with Barbara Ward on the written agreement to buy the residence owned by the plaintiffs, Mehdi and Goltaj Imen (the Imens), in order to generate a real estate commission for himself. Shortly after the close of escrow, Glassford quitclaimed his interest in the property to Ward who promptly defaulted on secured notes which represented substantially all of the purchase price. The Imens then filed this action against Glassford, his…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Standefer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- People v. SimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Vandenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Karin White v. City of PasadenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Mike Jacobs, Jr. William Webb, Individuals Westwind Releasing Corp., a California Corporation, and Michael Givens v. CBS Broadcasting Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Smith v. EXXON MOBIL OIL CORP.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Marek v. Board of Podiatric MedicineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.