National Citizens Bank v. McKinley
Supreme Court of Minnesota
After the former appeal, reported in 115 Minn. 378, 132 N. W. 290, the defendants amended their answer, setting tip the defenses stated in the opinion. The case was tried before Olsen, J., acting in place of the judge for the Sixth judicial district, and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $6,920.14. From an order denying defendants’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, they appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Action for an alleged wrongful conversion of certain logs and timber, in which plaintiff had a verdict, and defendants appealed from an order denying their alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.
The action was before the court on a former appeal, and was remanded for a new trial. 115 Minn. 378, 132 N. W. 290. The facts are there stated, but to a,n understanding of the questions presented on this appeal a short restatement is necessary. Before the last trial defendants amended their answer, in response to suggestions in the former opinion, setting up in defense (1) a paramount…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Union National Bank v. Moline, Milburn & Stoddard Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
- Fairweather v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- National Citizens Bank v. McKinleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
3Cited by4 opinions
- George Hess v. Sam Paulo, Sr.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1949
- O'Connor v. SchwanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Singer v. Farmers State Bank of GoodridgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Roehrs v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929