William M. Sonny Landham v. Lewis Galoob Toys, Inc. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge.
William “Sonny” Landham claims that Defendants-Appellees Galoob Toys, Inc. (f/ k/a/ Lewis Galoob Toys, Inc.) (“Galoob”) and Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. (“Fox”) violated his Kentucky-law “right of publicity” and federal Lanham Act rights by marketing without his permission an action figure of the character he played in the movie Predator. The district court entered summary judgment in favor of Galoob and Fox, and Landham timely appealed. Because we conclude that Land-ham has neither demonstrated that he has a public identity sufficient to support a claim…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Herman Miller, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Palazzetti Imports and Exports, Inc., Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Rosa Parks v. Laface RecordsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Etw Corporation v. Jireh Publishing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- The Ohio State Univ. v. Redbubble, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Richard Lemarbe v. Jerome J. Wisneski, Sharon Fairbanks Dennis StraubCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.