Legal Opinion

Mudd v. Shroader

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 11, 1913PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Chief Justice Hobson

Affirming.

In November, 1909, Mrs. Jennie Shroader and N. G. Ballard, doing business under the firm name of Shroader and Ballard, bought of James A. Mudd a farm in Marion rented portions of the farm to Adrian Blair and James County. Some time prior to' the purchase, Mudd had R. Carrico for the year 1910, and in the contract of purchase it was agreed that Blair and Carrico were to have *697the portions of the farm which Mudd had rented to them for the year 1910, and that Mudd would guarantee that they would faithfully carry out their rental contract.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Forest v. CrenshawCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1883
  2. Gambrell v. GambrellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  3. Chesapeake v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897
  4. Runyons v. BurchettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Neely v. StrongCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  2. Pennyroyal Fair Ass'n v. HiteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Travelers Insurance Machine Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  4. Pendergrass v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
  5. Swango v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API