Legal Opinion
Runyons v. Burchett
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided October 20, 1909PublishedCited by 2 opinions
CASE 3. — ACTION BY H. M. RUNYONS AND ANOTHER AGAINST T. H. BURCHETT, IN WHICH HE PILED A COUNTERCLAIM — Appeal from Floyd Circuit Court. D. W. Gardner, Circuit Judge. Judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. —
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Hobson
— Affirming.
On August 18, 1902, a written contract was entered into between T. H. Burchett of the first part, and A. L. James of the second part, which among other things contained the following provisions:
“Party of the first part does this day bargain and sell to party of the second part all the white oak and chestnut belonging to him. Party of the second part do bind himself to mark said timber from twenty inches clear the bark at an ordinary stump, with all trees that will make a clean log 30 feet long. Second party agrees to pay first party $1.00 per…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hill v. RaglandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
- Forest v. CrenshawCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1883
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pendergrass v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
- Mudd v. ShroaderCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913