Legal Opinion
Saenz v. Trans Union, LLC
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided August 15, 2007No. CV 05-1206-PKPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
REDDEN, Senior District Judge:
On June 4, 2007, Magistrate Judge Papak issued his Findings and Recommendation (doc. 74) in the above-captioned case, recommending defendant’s motion for summary judgment (doc. 43) be denied. Magistrate Judge Papak also recommended defendant’s alternative motion for partial summary judgment be granted as to each of plaintiffs claims alleging defendant’s violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1681e(b), but denied in all other respects.
The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Taylor v. First Advantage Background Services Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Grigoryan v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
- Bradshaw v. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LPDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2011
- Dixon-Rollins v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Starkey v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.