Legal Opinion

State v. Sullivan

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 24, 2012No. 090237FE; A143645PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

A jury found defendant guilty of two counts of sodomy in the first degree, ORS 163.405, and two counts of sodomy in the second degree, ORS 163.395. On appeal, defendant asserts that the trial court erred in denying his request for a jury instruction. Defendant argues that the state presented two theories about how the jury could find the required element of forcible compulsion — that is, physical force or a threat — to commit sodomy in the first degree, and the court should have instructed the jury that it had to agree on the theory for defendant’s guilt. Accordingly, defendant argues, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Farmers Ins. Co. of Oregon v. MowryOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. LotchesOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. BootsOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  2. State v. BecknerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. State v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API