Legal Opinion

United States v. Maghinang

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided April 15, 1953No. Cr. A. No. 822PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEAHY, Chief Judge.

The United States filed an' information against defendá’nt Olaf Vincent' Maghinang, in which . it charged:

“That on- or.-about December 11; 1952, in the District of Delaware, Olaf Vincent Maghinang, had in his possession 41 marihuana cigarettes, on which no transfer tax- had been paid, . the said Olaf Vincent Maghinang being a transferee required to pay the . transfer tax imposed by Section 2590 (a), Title 26, U.S.C., in violation .of Section 2593(a)-, Title 26, U.S.C.”

The case was tried by jury which, after deliberation, were unable- to arrive at a verdict of either guilt…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. LabatoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  2. Nicola v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1934
  3. United States v. RussoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  4. Paul v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1935
  5. Ridenour v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Juan Avalos Guevara, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  2. Alfred Smith Francis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
  3. Alfonso Espinoza Covarrubias v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  4. United States v. WapnickDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1962
  5. United States v. TijerinaDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API