Legal Opinion

United States v. Wapnick

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided February 2, 1962No. 60-Cr.-63PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARTELS, District Judge.

Defendant Robert Ezersky, along with fifteen other defendants, was indicted for transporting motor vehicles in interstate commerce with knowledge that the same were stolen, and for conspiracy to transport said vehicles. The indictment charged Ezersky with ten (10) substantive violations. At the close of all *713the evidence one of the substantive counts against Ezersky was dismissed on motion of the United States. At the same time he made a motion, pursuant to Rule 29, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A., for a judgment of acquittal on the remaining counts.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Curley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
  5. Mortensen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. MelilloDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1967
  2. United States v. HurleyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1968
  3. United States v. BeigelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  4. Robert Glenn Bibbins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  5. United States v. BrooksDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API