Legal Opinion
Ridenour v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 7, 1926No. 3400-3403PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Circuit Judge.
The above-named defendants were indicted and tried with Walter Temme and F. L. Kendig for having used the United States mails to carry out a scheme and artifice to defraud, which they had devised, and for conspiracy in violation of sections 37 and 215 of the federal Criminal Code (Comp. St. §§ 10201, 10385). The indictment contains 13 counts. The first 12 are for the misuse of the mails, and the last is for conspiracy to carry out the scheme and artifice set out in the other counts.
At the trial, the judge directed the jury to return a verdict of .“not guilty” as to Walter…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Hamilton v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Union Pacific Coal Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Wright v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
- Hart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1898
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Bryan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Benjamin Dranow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- George Beck v. The United States of America, David R. Tuthill v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- Nicola v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1934
- Van Gorder v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.