Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 26, 1996No. 94-2509PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARP, W., Judge.

Thomas Mitchell appeals from a final summary judgment which held that State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) has no duty to defend him, and he has no liability coverage under his policy issued by State Farm for injuries suffered by his wife, Pamela. The claim against Thomas was asserted in a counterclaim filed by Kis-korna, the defendant and driver of another car involved in the accident. She sought to establish Thomas was solely or at least partially responsible for the accident and thus he should be required to contribute his proportionate share of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Transamerica Insurance v. RoyleMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Reid v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1977
  3. Sturiano v. BrooksSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  4. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. WardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  5. Neil v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Green v. United States Automobile Ass'n Auto & Property InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  2. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. MAZZARINO EX REL. MAZZARINODistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  3. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance v. Mazzarino ex rel. MazzarinoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API