Legal Opinion

State v. Thomsen

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 4, 2015No. COA14–1235PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTER, JR., ROBERT N., Judge.

*476The State appeals from a sua sponte order of the trial court granting Zachary David Thomsen ("Defendant") appropriate relief pursuant to N.C. Gen.Stat. § 15A-1420(d). The State argues the trial court erred in allowing its own motion for appropriate relief on Eighth Amendment grounds. Defendant argues this Court lacks jurisdiction to hear the case via a writ of certiorari, and even if this Court does have jurisdiction, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting Defendant appropriate relief.

For the following reasons, we vacate the trial court's order…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. North Carolina National Bank v. Virginia Carolina BuildersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. StevensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. YsaguireSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. ThomsenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
  2. State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  3. State v. SimsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  4. State v. ToddCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  5. State v. SimsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API