Legal Opinion · Dissent

56-70 58th Street Holding Corp. v. Fedders-Quigan Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 17, 1959Published

1Dissent

Burke, J. (dissenting).

The claim here is solely to recover rental for a period when the tenant was no longer in occupancy. By a covenant, in a two-year lease commencing March, 1953, the landlord assumed the burden of obtaining a certificate of occupancy covering the use of the premises ‘ ‘ by the Tenant for warehousing and shipping of its goods ”. At the time, therefore, that the lease was made, the new use authorized under the lease concededly was unlawful (Administrative Code of City of New York, § C26-185.0; Shontz Co. v. Laffay, 225 App. Div. 263).

The documentary proof shows that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rosenthal Paper Co. v. National Folding Box & Paper Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Krausi v. FifeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  3. Marks v. DellaglioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  4. H. B. Shontz Co. v. LaffayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  5. De Angelis v. White-All Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API