De Angelis v. White-All Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
We find no ambiguity in the lease involved in this action. The question of construction, therefore, was for the court rather than the jury. However, under the circumstances we consider that the defendant was not *874prejudiced by the submission of the issue of construction to the jury in this case.
Under the lease the tenant was required to obtain the license for the billiard parlor and any permit necessary under the local law relating to occupancy of places of public assembly. The landlord made no representation as to the suitability of the premises for use as a billiard parlor. But in view of…
2Cited by6 opinions
- 56-70 58th Street Holding Corp. v. Fedders-Quigan Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Delaware County Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- Park Sheraton Corp. v. GrassoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
- 56-70 58th Street Holding Corp. v. Fedders-Quigan Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1959
- 56-70 58th Street Holding Corp. v. Fedders-Quigan Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.