Legal Opinion

Monfort v. Stevens

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1888PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Calhoun. (Hooker, J.) Ejectment. Plaintiffs bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion. .

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

In this action of ejectment both parties claim through Samuel Huxford.

The cause was tried before Hon. Frank A. Hooker without a jury, who made a written statement of facts and law' as follows:

“1. On the first day of November, 1865, Samuel Huxford was seized in fee of the following-described premises, viz: Commencing at a stake one hundred feet west of the northeast corner of block number fifty-seven, in the village of Albion, running thence south, parallel with the east line of said block, to the north line of railroad lands; thence northwesterly, along said railroad lands, to the west line…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Farabaugh v. RhodeMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Staub v. HamptonTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Quade v. PillardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  4. Hess v. HaasMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Nordberg v. ToddMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API