Legal Opinion

Ennis v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 7, 1917No. A-2427PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error from District Court, Texas County; R. McMillan, Assigned Judge. • Israel L. Ennis was convicted of larceny, and he brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

The plaintiff in error, Israel L. Ennis, was convicted in the district court of Texas county, at the November, 1914, term, on a charge of larceny, and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for one year and one day.

Numerous assignments of error are urged in the brief, most of which are based upon propositions tnat are not likely to arise again should this cause be retried. We find it necessary to discuss only two assignments of error for the purpose of disposing of the present appeal.

The first is set out in the petition in error as assignment No. 6, and is based upon…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Owen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Hopkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Bivens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Flohr v. Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Abby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
  2. Gorum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. State v. TuttleNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Crosswhite v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1957
  5. Parmenter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API