Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Stringer

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1982No. 79-6-323, CA 16904, SC 27482Published

1DissentTongue, J.

This is the first case in which this court has squarely faced the important question whether “accident reconstruction” by opinion testimony of expert witnesses should be admissible in Oregon and, if so, the conditions under which such testimony should be admitted. In recognition of the importance of this case, both the Oregon Trial Lawyers Association (OTLA) and the Oregon Association of Defense Counsel (OADC) were requested by this court to submit briefs as amicus curiae.

I do not disagree with the holding by the majority that the exclusion of such opinion testimony is not necessarily…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Carter v. MoberlyOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Ritter v. BEALSOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. State v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Tuite v. UNION PACIFIC STAGESOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Yundt v. D & D BOWL, INC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API