Legal Opinion
Picard v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided October 28, 1981No. 09 81 041 CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion on Motion for Rehearing of Motion for Extension of Time
KEITH, Justice.
In the matter above captioned, the record was approved on August 11, 1981. Art. 40.09, § 7, V.A.C.C.P., as amended, Vernon’s Texas Session Law Service 1981, Acts 67th Leg., Reg.Sess., Ch. 291, Sec. 108, at 804, 807. 1 Counsel was advised by the trial court of such fact and that his appellate brief was due to be filed within thirty days thereafter. See Art. 40.09, § 9, V.A.C.C.P.
No brief was filed within the prescribed time; but, on September 9, 1981, counsel filed a motion for an extension of time within which to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- High v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Currie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Guillory v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Duncan v. EvansCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Reese v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1989
- Jenkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Duncan v. EvansCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Gomez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.