Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gomez v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided December 30, 1988No. 13-88-433-CRPublished

1DissentSeerden, Justice

I dissent. The primary purpose of Texas appellate courts is to decide appeals from trial courts and to cure errors that have deprived parties of a fair trial. See Jiles v. State, 751 S.W.2d 620 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1988). The majority decision allows this Court, in this case, to avoid performing the job for which it was created. Nothing in the rules of appellate procedure or the case law of Texas compels this result.

Tex.R.App.P. 83, directs that an appeal shall not be dismissed for defects or irregularities in appellate procedure, either of form or substance, without allowing a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Ward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API