Legal Opinion
State v. Parham
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 4, 2002No. AC 21710PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HENNESSY, J.
The defendant, Eric M. Parham, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a trial to the court, of speeding in violation of General Statutes § 14-219 (c) (2).1 On appeal, the defendant argues that the court improperly (1) found that there was sufficient evidence to convict him of speeding and (2) took judicial notice that “everyone exceeds the posted speed limit” to discredit his theory that the device used to measure his speed was malfunctioning. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The record sets forth the following facts and procedural history. On…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. BarnettConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- State v. BushSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- State v. SenquizConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. AbrahamConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. HarveyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- SOUTH WINDSOR CEMETERY ASS'N, INC. v. LindquistConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009