Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Mammo

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 7, 2003No. Docket 229361PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilder, J.

By order of our Supreme Court in Brooks v Mammo, 463 Mich 852 (2000), defendants appeal as on leave granted. After a jury returned a verdict for plaintiff in the amount of $50,000, the district court entered a judgment in the amount of $17,985, reflecting the $10,000 jurisdictional limit provided by MCL 600.8301, plus costs and interest. The district court denied plaintiffs motion for attorney fees as mediation sanctions. On appeal, the circuit court reversed the district court’s finding that the amount of the judgment was limited by MCL 600.8301 and that mediation sanctions were not…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mitcham v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Railroad Co. v. GrantSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Mudge v. MacOmb CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Etefia v. Credit Technologies, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Little v. Howard Johnson Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Clohset v. No Name Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Davis v. State Employees' Retirement BoardMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Moody v. Home Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Frankfurth v. Detroit Medical CenterMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Clohset v. No Name Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API