Legal Opinion

National Audubon Society v. U.S. Forest Service

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 15, 1993No. Nos. 91-35214, 91-35262, 91-35265PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROTT, Circuit Judge:

At issue is a challenge to four timber sales — the Ace, Butch, Varmit and Head timber sales — on unroaded and undeveloped areas of the Rogue River National Forest in Oregon. The United States Forest Service, Bill Christie Jr., and Huffman and Wright Logging Co. appeal the district court’s order permanently enjoining these timber sales pending completion of an environmental impact statement (“EIS”). The National Audubon Society and other environmental organizations (“Audubon Society”) seek .attorneys’ fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. Asarco, Inc. v. U. S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. (SS) Clarke v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  2. Adriana Hernandez v. Nancy A. BerryhillDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019
  3. Allen Hammler v. Regina Johnson, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026
  4. Allen Hammler v. Regina Johnson, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026
  5. Cota v. ThornellDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API