National Audubon Society v. U.S. Forest Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TROTT, Circuit Judge:
At issue is a challenge to four timber sales — the Ace, Butch, Varmit and Head timber sales — on unroaded and undeveloped areas of the Rogue River National Forest in Oregon. The United States Forest Service, Bill Christie Jr., and Huffman and Wright Logging Co. appeal the district court’s order permanently enjoining these timber sales pending completion of an environmental impact statement (“EIS”). The National Audubon Society and other environmental organizations (“Audubon Society”) seek .attorneys’ fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Asarco, Inc. v. U. S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- (SS) Clarke v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Adriana Hernandez v. Nancy A. BerryhillDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019
- Allen Hammler v. Regina Johnson, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026
- Allen Hammler v. Regina Johnson, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026
- Cota v. ThornellDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.