Cannon v. Cannon
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
May an unemancipated minor child maintain an action against his parents for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by their negligence?
That question was considered in Sorrentino v. Sorrentino (248 N. Y. 626), when the court denied the existence of such a right of action. The question is again presented by the defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of a complaint now before us wherein the plaintiff, an unemancipated minor, demands from his father and the estate of his deceased mother damages for personal injuries which are said to have been sustained through the mother’s fault. It is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Rozell v. RozellNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Sorrentino v. SorrentinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Lasecki v. KabaraWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
3Cited by67 opinions
- Holodook v. SpencerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Emery v. EmeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Gelbman v. GelbmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Cowgill, Adm'r v. Boock, Adm'rOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Hebel v. Hebel Ex Rel. HebelAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.