Legal Opinion

Carter v. Martin

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 13, 1927No. 17810PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

Although it is the general rule that heirs at law can not maintain a suit upon a chose in action in favor of their intestate, and that such a suit can be brought only by an administrator (Brown v. Mutual Life Ins. Co., 146 Ga. 123, 90 S. E. 856; Hill v. Maffett, 3 Ga. App. 89, 59 S. E. 325; Wilson v. Brice, 23 Ga. App. 734, 99 S. E. 385; Armstrong v. Harper, 25 Ga. App. 71, 102 S. E. 463), there may exist special circumstances authorizing an exception to this rule in some instances. Denny v. Gardner, 149 Ga. 42 (99 S. E. 27). Thus, where, as in the present case, the plaintiff: in a judgment…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brown v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  2. Hill v. MaffettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  3. Moughon v. MastersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  4. Denny v. GardnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  5. Wilson v. BriceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bell v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  2. Bond v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  3. Bennett v. BottomsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API