Legal Opinion

Matthews v. Department of Corrections

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1992No. 18617PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISTLINE, Justice.

Terrence Matthews appeals from the Industrial Commission's denial of his motion for modification of a compensation agreement previously entered into by Matthews and the State Insurance Fund (SIF); the motion is based on an alleged change of condition or the need to correct a manifest injustice. I.C. § 72-719. Also challenged is the Commission’s denial of Matthews’ request for further medical benefits. The issues on appeal are (1) whether the Industrial Commission’s findings of fact are supported by substantial competent evidence, and (2) whether the compensation agreement…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Woodvine v. Triangle Dairy, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Lopez v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Combs v. Kelly LoggingIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Bennett v. Clark Hereford RanchIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Graybill v. Swift & Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Davaz v. Priest River Glass Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Henderson v. McCain Foods, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Palomo v. J.R. Simplot Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Magee v. Thompson Creek Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Davaz v. Priest River Glass Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API