Legal Opinion
United States v. Brunner
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 5, 1952No. 11577_1PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONS, Chief Judge.
The appeal involves the interpretation and scope of §§ 729 and 730 of Tit. 18 U.S. C.A. which authorize, subject to specific limitations, a suit against the United States in the Court of Claims for damages sustained as a result of an erroneous conviction and imprisonment. The sections involved are printed in the margin 1 and their application is denied in the circumstances hereinafter detailed. The precise question has not heretofore been considered by a reviewing court.
On October 16, 1947, the appellee, Brun-ner, was convicted in the United States District Court for the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Funk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Benson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Rosen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- United States v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- United States v. KeeganDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1947
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Mhammad Abu-Shawish v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Garner v. WolfinbargerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Nelson v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Monarch Insurance Company of Ohio v. May Spach, as Receiver for Ro-Ben, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- John A. Betts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.