Legal Opinion

In re Carter

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided October 20, 1899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In the Matter of a Habeas Corpus on the Relation of Oberlin M. Carter. Writ dismissed.

1Opinion of the Court

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The sentence of the court-martial, duly approved and confirmed, reads: “To be dismissed from the service of the United States; to suffer a fine of five thousand dollars; to be confined at hard labor, at such place as the proper authority may direct, for five years; and the crime, punishment, name, and place of abode of the accused to be published in and about the station and in the state from which the accused came or where he usually resides.” The contention of the relator is that, conceding that the court-martial had jurisdiction of the per*497son of the accused and of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. United States v. TynenSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. United States v. AuffmordtSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carter v. WoodringCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
  2. Carter v. McClaughryU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas · 1900
  3. Rosborough v. RossellDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1944
  4. Ex parte HenkesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API