Legal Opinion

Carter v. McClaughry

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas

Decided December 10, 1900PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Proceedings in habeas corpus for the discharge of Oberlin M. Carter, a military prisoner of the United States, on petition of I. Stanton Carter.

1Opinion of the Court

HOOK, District Judge.

This is a proceeding in habeas corpus. The writ having been allowed, the canse arises on petitioners demurrer to the return thereto. Oberlin M. Carter, who was a captain in the corps of engineers of the United States army, was tried before a general court-martial which convened at Savannah, Ga., upon 4 charges of violation of the articles of war and 37 specifications thereunder. He was found guilty of the offenses set forth in 16 of the specifications and of the 4 charges which the specifications supported. In accordance with the practice in such tribunals, the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YarbroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Evans v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Ex Parte ParksSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Claassen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Ex Parte BigelowSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carter v. WoodringCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
  2. Wong Sun v. FluckeyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1922
  3. Wong Sun v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API