Legal Opinion

Brown v. Watson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 12, 1955Published

1Per curiam

The issuance of the stock of the corporation in return for entering the corporation’s employ was a violation of section 69 of the Stock Corporation Law (Stevens v. Episcopal Church History Co., 140 App. Div. 570; B & C Elec. Constr. Co. v. Owen, 176 App. Div. 399, affd. 227 N. Y. 569; Palmer v. Scheftel, 183 App. Div. 77; Shaw v. Ansaldi Co., 178 App. Div. 589). While it may be said that special knowledge, experience and contacts in a particular field is sometMng of value, nevertheless it may not be considered as “ property ” witMn the meaning of section 69. To broaden the section so as to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stevens v. Episcopal Church History Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  2. Lamphere v. . LangNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Shaw v. Ansaldi Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  4. Breck v. BrewsterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  5. Palmer v. ScheftelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API