Legal Opinion

Childs v. Frederickson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1920No. Civil No. 1728PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Pima. Samuel L. Pattee, Judge.

1Per curiam

The appellant, against whom there was a verdict, moved for a new trial upon all the issues of the case. The ruling of the court upon the motion for a new trial is as follows:

“The court, being now fully advised in the premises, does order that the verdict herein be set *249aside only in respect to damages and in accordance with paragraph 598, Eevised Statutes of Arizona, and further orders that a new trial be granted upon the question of damages only.”

The appellant assigns as error the refusal of the court to set aside the judgment, and the refusal to grant him a new trial on the whole of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Merrill v. WheelerArizona Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Marriage of Bugh v. BughCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  2. Hatch v. LeightonArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Adkins v. AdkinsArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Skelsey v. KuhnArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Navarro v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API