Legal Opinion

Betancourt v. Storke Housing Investors

California Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 2003No. S103942PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

We granted review to determine whether the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) (29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq.) preempts a mechanic’s lien action (Civ. Code, § 3110) 1 brought by laborers to recover unpaid contributions to their employee benefit plans. ERISA preempts state laws that “relate to” employee benefit plans. (29 U.S.C. § 1144(a).) In 1991, we held that ERISA preempted a similar mechanic’s lien statute (§ 3111) that “single[d] out ERISA plans for special treatment” and, thus, related to employee benefit plans. (Carpenters So. Cal. Admin. Corp. v.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. MacKey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Cambridge Integrated Services Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. United Riggers & Erectors, Inc. v. Coast Iron & Steel Co.California Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Village Northridge Homeowners Assn. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Kashani v. TSANN KUEN CHINA ENTERPRISE CO.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Coffman Specialties, Inc. v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API