Legal Opinion

People v. Jacquin

New York County Courts

Decided January 31, 1985PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Allan L. Winick, J.

Defendant moves to dismiss the indictment claiming a denial of a speedy trial under CPL 30.30 (1) and 30.20 (1).

An agreed statement of the facts has been submitted by both sides in lieu of a hearing.

This application presents a novel question of law apparently never dealt with by our courts, arising from an application by the People pursuant to CPL 170.20 (2) for an adjournment in the District Court to afford the District Attorney an opportunity to present the case to the Grand Jury for indictment.

FACTS

A felony complaint in this case, charging defendant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. TaranovichNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. WattsNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. LomaxNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. People v. BrothersNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. People v. ImbesiNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. JacquinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. People v. MulliganNew York Supreme Court · 1988
  3. People v. RiveraCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1989
  4. State v. HardinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  5. Ceasar v. Hon. campbell/stateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API