Ceasar v. Hon. campbell/state
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WINTHROP, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 Marcus Dean Ceasar (“Petitioner”) has filed a petition for special action, challenging the trial court’s ruling granting the State’s motion to dismiss a supervening indictment 1 and allowing the State to proceed on the original indictment against Petitioner. Petitioner maintains the supervening indictment necessarily replaced or voided the first indictment. For the following reasons, we accept jurisdiction of the special action petition but deny relief, concluding the trial court did not err in granting the State’s motion to dismiss the supervening…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- State v. MoodyArizona Supreme Court · 2004
- Pool v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- United States v. Rojas-ContrerasSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. GomezArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. BojorquezArizona Supreme Court · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. WilbonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2026