State v. Coffey
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
LAKE, Justice.
The defendant’s five assignments of error are:(1) His motion to quash the bill of indictment should have been allowed because the indictment does not state sufficiently the location of the dwelling house alleged to have been burglarized or the property stolen therefrom;(2) The defendant was not informed of his right to be represented by counsel when put in the lineup at which he was identified by Mrs. Matheny;(3) In his argument to the jury, the District Attorney “argued facts which were not in evidence”;(4) “The entire judge’s charge is * * * biased toward the State * * *…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- State v. FosterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. CrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. McCoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. BeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.