Legal Opinion

Youngquist v. Thomas

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1938No. 27039. Department TwoPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff instituted this action for the purpose of obtaining possession of, and quieting title to, certain real property in King county. He alleged that he was the sole owner and entitled to possession of lots five and six, block sixteen, in Squire Park Addition to Seattle, situated at 1901 and 1903 east Jefferson street, and that defendant was in possession thereof under claim of title.

In her answer, defendant denied the allegations of the complaint and then made a separate answer, the pertinent parts of which are as follows: That on or about July 8, 1930, she purchased the premises through…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Parr v. State ex rel. CockeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
  2. Douthitt v. MacCulskyWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Shoemake v. FinlaysonWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Currier v. PerryWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. American Bonding Co. v. LoebWashington Supreme Court · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Loveridge v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Meder v. CCME CORP.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  3. Bacon v. GardnerWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Hackler v. HacklerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  5. Symington v. HudsonWashington Supreme Court · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API