Legal Opinion
United States v. Nathan E. Gundy
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided November 23, 2016No. 14-12113PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HULL, Circuit Judge:
Defendant Nathan E. Gundy appeals his conviction and 288-month sentence for being a convicted felon in possession of firearms. The district court determined that Gundy was an armed career criminal under the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”),, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), because he had' at least three prior Georgia burglary convictions, each of which qualified as a predicate “violent felony” under the enumerated crimes provision of the ACCA. On appeal, Gundy challenges his designation as an armed career criminal under § 924(e).
After review of the record and with the benefit of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- United States v. Michael HerroldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Anthony Potter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Terrance Tyrone DavisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Randall CornetteCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. DegeareCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.