United States v. Randall Cornette
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FLOYD, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Randall Cornette was sentenced as an armed career criminal because of certain predicate state convictions that the district court considered to be "violent felonies" under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), 18 U.S.C. § 924 (e). Cornette now contends that in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Johnson v. United States , --- U.S. ----, 135 S. Ct. 2551 , 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015), he no longer has the requisite number of predicate offenses for the ACCA's sentencing enhancement. In the unique context of the facts presented, we agree.
I
Cornette pleaded guilty to…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- United States v. Antonio SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Michael BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Jimmy AllredCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Soterio HopeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- Deandre Markee King v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.