Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. W.S. Cumby & Son, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 3, 1989No. Civ. A. 88-0613PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VAN ANTWERPEN, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. The action arises out of plaintiff’s suffering personal injuries during the course of his employment. For the reasons stated below, after hearing oral argument, defendant’s motion will be granted.
FACTS
On September 21, 1985, CIB Associates (“CIB”) hired defendant W.S. Cumby & Son, Inc. (“Cumby”) as general contractor for the reconstruction of the Cast Iron Building. (Complaint 116). Pursuant to its contract with CIB, Cumby subcontracted with RVS, Inc. (“RVS”) for…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McCarthy v. Dan Lepore & Sons Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Donaldson v. Com., Dept. of Transp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Fulgham v. Daniel J. Keating Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
- Mitchell (Thomas William, Helen) v. W.S. Cumby & Son, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989