Legal Opinion

State v. Exiga

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided January 10, 2002No. 13-00-00332-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FEDERICO G. HINOJOSA, Justice.

The State appeals from the trial court’s order granting a motion to suppress filed by appellee, Luis Exiga. See Tex. Code Crim. PROC. Ann. art. 44.01(a)(5) (Vernon Supp.2001). We affirm.

A. STANDARD OF REVIEW

When we review a trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress, we are required to give almost total deference to the trial court’s factual determinations which are supported by the record, especially when they are based on an evaluation of credibility and demeanor. Carmouche v. State, 10 S.W.3d 323, 327-28 (Tex.Crim.App.2000); Guzman v. State, 955…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Carmouche v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  4. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  5. Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Marrs, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
  2. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports2004
  3. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports2003
  4. State v. Michael Lavern Marrs, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API