Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Watkins' Estate

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 4, 1932PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPowers, C. J.

The plaintiff seeks to recover from the estate of the late Harris R. Watkins a claim for the care and keep of a Shetland pony called “Pinto.” He presented this claim to the commissioners of the estate, and it was disallowed. He appealed to the county court, where a jury trial resulted in a verdict and judgment in his favor. Exceptions by the defendant bring the case hereof or. review.

The plaintiff’s evidence tended to show the following facts: Pinto was a pony that Dr. Watkins’ son, Eustace, who died in 1924, had and used when he was a small boy. The Watkins family, which consisted of Dr.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gilfillan v. Gilfillan's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916
  2. Blaisdell & Barron v. DavisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1900
  3. In re Wells' WillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1921
  4. Vermont Shade Roller Co. v. Burlington Traction Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1930
  5. Fuller v. ValiquetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Evans v. MasonArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Gero v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  3. Childrens' Home, Inc. v. State Highway BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
  4. In re Estate of BoisvertSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
  5. In Re Estate of GatesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API