Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Ross-Higgins Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 1, 1908No. 1,440PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorrow, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). The errors assigned relate to the rulings of the court in the exclusion and admission of evidence and the action of the court instructing the jury to find a verdict for the defendant. In our view of the case it will be sufficient to determine the question whether upon the evidence the court was justified in instructing the jury to find a verdict for the defendant.

Section 2387 of the Revised Statutes (43 U.S.C.A. § 718), provides that: “Whenever any portion of the public lands have been or may be settled upon and occupied as a town-site,” it shall be lawful…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coryell v. CainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Malony v. AdsitSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Staininger v. AndrewsNevada Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Minturn v. BurrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Courtney v. TurnerNevada Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. 10.95 Acres of Land in JuneauDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1948
  2. Gillespie v. WindustDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1956
  3. Oswald v. COLUMBIA LUMBER COMPANY OF ALASKAAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Juneau Independent School Dist. v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1950
  5. Julius Kayser & Co. v. Textron Inc.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API