Legal Opinion

Ewing v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 2, 1989No. Nos. 54484, 54485PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Presiding Judge.

This case reaches us on consolidated appeals by both parties. Plaintiff appeals from the trial court order granting defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and alternatively conditionally granting a new trial on the basis that the verdict was excessive. Defendant appeals from the trial court’s failure to grant a new trial on additional grounds. We affirm the trial court’s order granting judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

The action was brought under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA). Plaintiff is a traveling mechanic for defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Kimmie v. Terminal Railroad Assn.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. Orie W. Davis v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Keith v. Burlington Northern RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Stewart v. Alton & Southern Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Payton v. Union Pacific RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Roth v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Dillard v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API