Legal Opinion

State v. Layton

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided November 2, 1937No. 123PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harrington, J.,

delivering the opinion of the court:

This case is before us on the motion of the respondents to dismiss the relator’s petition for the issuance of a peremptory writ of mandamus. The sole question raised by that motion is whether, under the facts alleged, the relator is entitled, as a matter of right, to a certificate for a license to practice medicine and surgery in this State.

The petition, in substance, alleges that the relator was examined by the National Board of Medical Examiners and her qualifications to practice medicine and surgery were approved, and that approval…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Supervisors v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. MINOR v. the Mechanics Bank of AlexandriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  3. Leigton v. MaurySupreme Court of Virginia · 1882
  4. Barton v. SchmershallIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Thomas v. State Board of HealthWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. duPont v. MillsSuperior Court of Delaware · 1937
  2. Wilson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
  3. Ghadiali v. Delaware State Medical SocietyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1943
  4. Norman v. GoldmanSuperior Court of Delaware · 1961
  5. State ex rel. Oberly v. SimpsonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API