Legal Opinion

People v. Taveras

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 11, 2009PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Graffeo, J.

In this case, we hold that the actus reus underlying the crime of criminal sexual act in the third degree does not constitute a “material element” of falsifying business records in the first degree. We therefore agree with the Appellate Division that the sentencing court’s imposition of consecutive sentences for these crimes does not violate Penal Law § 70.25 (2).

Defendant Juan Paveras, an assistant principal at a high school in Manhattan, sexually abused a number of students from June 2003 until July 2004. The pattern of conduct primarily involved defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. LaureanoNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. People v. DayNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. People v. ParksNew York Court of Appeals · 2000

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. DePonceauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. People v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. People v. CasatelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
  4. People v. FelipeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. People v. HoughtalingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API