Legal Opinion
United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local No. 911 v. United Food & Commercial Workers International Union
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided October 31, 2000No. 3:99 CV 7713PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KATZ, District Judge.
This action is before the Court on Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 18) and Plaintiffs’ motion for oral argument (Doc. 29). Jurisdiction is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331, 28 U.S.C. § 2201, 29 U.S.C. § 185, 29 U.S.C. § 412, and 29 U.S.C. § 501. For the following reasons, Defendants’ motion to dismiss will be granted, and Plaintiffs’ motion will be denied.
Background 1
United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local No. 911, AFL — CIO, CLC (“Local 911”) is a duly chartered Local of the United Food and Commercial Workers…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Edward E. Westlake v. William Lucas, Sheriff of Wayne CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Finnegan v. LeuSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United Food and Commercial Workers International Union Local 911 v. United Food and Commercial Workers International UnionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- McCuiston v. HoffaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
- United Food and Commercial Workers International Union Local 911 v. United Food and Commercial Workers International UnionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002