Carlston v. Shenson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLING, J. pro tem.
Defendant, executrix of the last will of Gustave Weissbaum, deceased, appeals from a judgment for $67,346.84. The action was tried before a jury and represented a balance of principal and accumulated interest found to be due upon two promissory notes, executed and delivered to Anglo and London Paris National Bank as payee by G. Weissbaum & Co., a copartnership, in which decedent Weissbaum was one of the partners. One note was for $35,575.15 dated June 30, 1919, and the other for $70,000, dated August 31, 1920. The notes were purchased by Joseph F. Carlston, husband of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Citti v. BavaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Simonton v. Los Angeles Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Squires v. RiffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Ensign v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1924
- Fries v. American Lead Pencil Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Drotleff v. RenshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Horany v. ParisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Tobler v. ChapmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Bickford v. MauserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Shabshin v. PacificiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.