Legal Opinion

Carlston v. Shenson

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 30, 1941No. Civ. 11726PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLING, J. pro tem.

Defendant, executrix of the last will of Gustave Weissbaum, deceased, appeals from a judgment for $67,346.84. The action was tried before a jury and represented a balance of principal and accumulated interest found to be due upon two promissory notes, executed and delivered to Anglo and London Paris National Bank as payee by G. Weissbaum & Co., a copartnership, in which decedent Weissbaum was one of the partners. One note was for $35,575.15 dated June 30, 1919, and the other for $70,000, dated August 31, 1920. The notes were purchased by Joseph F. Carlston, husband of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Citti v. BavaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Simonton v. Los Angeles Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Squires v. RiffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Ensign v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Fries v. American Lead Pencil Co.California Supreme Court · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Drotleff v. RenshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Horany v. ParisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  3. Tobler v. ChapmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Bickford v. MauserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Shabshin v. PacificiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API